Image source: LaLibre.net Tecnologías Comunitarias
Page last updated on
The organizations and activists undersigned express our concern and firm rejection of the multiple irregularities, illegalities, and violations of due process observed over 5 years in the case of Ola Bini, a programmer and human rights defender. This case has not only exposed critical deficiencies and weaknesses in the Ecuadorian judicial system but has also revealed how government practices continuously threaten the fundamental principles of justice and freedom in Ecuador. The irregularities in the case include:
-
Arbitrary detention and prosecution: Bini was initially detained without clarity or sufficient evidence, suffering prolonged detentions without formal charges, and facing accusations later declared unfounded and, ultimately, illegal under the provisions of habeas corpus, https://www.eff.org/de/deeplinks/2023/03/aftermath-ola-binis-unanimous-acquittal-ecuadorian-court.
-
Manipulation and lack of evidence: During the trial, neither the prosecution nor the private accusation could demonstrate any illicit conduct with evidence, which calls into question the integrity of the judicial process, https://www.acceso.or.cr/2022/05/09/informe-de-la-mision-de-observacion-un-proceso-paradigmatico-para-los-derechos-humanos-en-la-era-digital-el-caso-de-ola-bini/.
-
Political influence and questioned judicial impartiality: Signs of political influence during the administration of Lenín Moreno have been pointed out, affecting the impartiality and justice in handling the case, https://www.amnesty.org/es/latest/press-release/2019/08/ecuador-gobierno-interfiere-en-proceso-penal-contra-ola-bini/.
-
Irregularities in the appeal: The impartiality of the judges during the appeal, especially those who decided to keep Bini detained in 2019, has been seriously questioned, highlighting the need for more rigorous scrutiny and a fair and transparent judicial process, https://www.eff.org/es/deeplinks/2024/03/ola-bini-faces-ecuadorian-prosecutors-seeking-overturn-acquittal-cybercrime-charge.
The sentence issued by judges Pacheco and Fabara, the latter currently under investigation for alleged acts of corruption by the Prosecutor’s Office (https://inredh.org/dos-de-tres-jueces-revocaron-la-sentencia-que-declaraba-inocente-al-activista-digital-ola-bini), appears to have been influenced by external political pressures, as there is no evidence whatsoever to justify such a sentence. This decision not only ignores the lack of evidence but also sentences Bini to a year in prison and the payment of economic fines, based on the alleged «attempt» to access a telecommunications system of the CNT, an accusation that was not even the subject of the initial crime theory of the Prosecutor’s Office.
The judicial decision not only adds to a terribly irresponsible and manipulated handling of the case but also sets an alarming precedent for freedoms in general. [1] In particular, the criminalization of tools like Tor, which are vital to ensure security and privacy online, along with the attempt to criminalize the acquisition and possession of technical knowledge, points to a dangerous trend of interpreting technological skills as potential threats, rather than recognizing them as essential components for innovation and information security. This approach not only undermines the fundamental rights to privacy and free expression but also endangers the integrity and evolution of a secure digital environment in Ecuador.
For all the above reasons, we urge the competent authorities to:
-
Review and immediately correct the irregularities presented in this case.
-
Ensure a fair and transparent process in Ola Bini’s appeal and in all judicial cases in the country.
-
Cease the use of judicial and security systems as tools of repression.
-
Adopt measures to strengthen a fair, impartial judicial system free of political influences.
-
Not criminalize individual or collective knowledge or technical capabilities.
-
Not criminalize the use of technological tools that are fundamental to the free exercise of freedom of expression and privacy, essential human rights.
We also call on the international community and human rights organizations to continue to closely observe this case and demand Ecuador to comply with its international obligations in terms of human rights.
[1] In this regard, the Ola Bini Observation Mission has already expressed the implications for the enforcement of digital rights of a judgment handed down regardless of technical and legal criteria: https://articulo19.org/ola-bini-inocente-una-sentencia-clave-para-la-defensa-de-derechos-digitales
We sign in alphabetical order:
Access Now – International
ARTICLE 19 – International
Association for Progressive Communications (APC) – International
Associació Pangea Coordinadora Comunicació per a la Cooperació – España/Cataluña
Barracon Digital – Honduras
Centro de Documentación en Derechos Humanos “Segundo Montes Mozo S.J.” (CSMM) – Ecuador
Centre for Information Technology and Development – Nigeria
Código Sur – Costa Rica
Conexión Educativa – Ecuador
Cooperativa Autogestionaria Sulá Batsú – Costa Rica
Cooperativa Tierra Común – Mexico
CryptoRave – BraZil
Derechos Digitales – Latin America
Digital Defenders Partnership – International
Electronic Frontier Foundation – International
Fantsuam Foundation – Nigeria
Front Line Defenders – International
Fundacion Acceso – Costa Rica
Fundación InternetBolivia.org – Bolivia
Fundación Karisma – Colombia
Fundación Openlab – Ecuador
Fundación Regional de Asesoría en Derechos Humanos (INREDH) – Ecuador
JCA-NET – Japan
Jokkolabs Banjul – Gambia
LaborNet – United States
LaLibre.net Tecnologías Comunitarias – Ecuador
MariaLab – Brazil
May First Movement Technology – United States/Mexico
Rhizomatica – Mexico
Saravá – Brazil
SeguDigital – Mexico
Ser Valiente en Red – Peru
SocialTic – Mexico
Sursiendo, Comunicación y Cultura Digital – Mexico
Taller de Comunicación Mujer – Ecuador
TEDIC – Paraguay
